Chapter 1 - Don’t Bargain Over Positions
1.
|
Everyone negotiates something everyday.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Positional bargaining is the method of negotiation by which:
|
|
Each side attempts to deceive the other side
|
|
People refuse to negotiate
|
|
Each side takes a position, argues for it, and makes concessions to reach a compromise
|
|
Each side negotiates from opposite sides of the table
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Efficiency is one of three criteria used to fairly judge any method of negotiation.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
A wise agreement can be defined as:
|
|
One that meets the legitimate interests of each side to the extent possible
|
|
One that resolves conflicting interests fairly
|
|
One that is durable and takes community interests into account
|
|
All of the above
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Arguing over positions produces unwise agreements.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Arguing over positions is extremely efficient.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Arguing over positions has no effect on ongoing relationships.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
In positional bargaining, the more you clarify your position and defend it against attack, the less committed you become to it.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Arguing over positions endangers an ongoing relationship as each side tries through sheer will power to force the other to change its position.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
The fewer people involved in a negotiation, the more serious the drawbacks to positional bargaining.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
In positional bargaining, people's egos become identified with their positions.
|
|
|
|
12.
|
When negotiating on the merits, participants are:
|
|
friends
|
|
adversaries
|
|
problem-solvers
|
|
good citizens
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 2 - Separate the People from the Problem
13.
|
A basic fact about negotiation is that you are dealing not with abstract representatives of the other side, but with human beings.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
The method of principled negotiation involves separating the people from the problem.
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Beyond reaching an agreement that satisfies his substantive interests, every negotiator also has an interest in:
|
|
The outcome of prior negotiations
|
|
The business of the other side
|
|
His relationship with the other side
|
|
His appearance
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Dealing with a substantive problem and maintaining a good working relationship need not be conflicting goals if the parties are committed and psychologically prepared to treat each separately on its own legitimate merits.
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Understanding the other side’s thinking is not simply a useful activity that will help you solve your problem. Their thinking is the problem.
|
|
|
|
18.
|
In a negotiation, particularly in a bitter dispute, talk is more important than feelings.
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Without communication there is no negotiation.
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 3 - Focus on Interests, Not positions
20.
|
The method of principled negotiation involves focusing on interests, not positions.
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Interests motivate people. They are the silent movers behind positions.
|
|
|
|
22.
|
Opposed positions are based on conflicting interests, not compatible ones.
|
|
|
|
23.
|
Reconciling interests rather than positions works because:
|
|
Interests are less important than positions
|
|
Interests usually conflict
|
|
Positions are easily defined.
|
|
For every interest there usually exist several possible positions that could satisfy it
|
|
|
|
24.
|
Interests define the problem.
|
|
|
|
25.
|
In principled negotiations, figuring out the other side's interests is at least as important as figuring out your own.
|
|
|
|
26.
|
A basic technique for identifying positions is to put yourself in their shoes, examine each position they take, and ask yourself why.
|
|
|
|
27.
|
Asking "Why Not?" is to identify the basic decision that those on the other side probably see you asking them for and then:
|
|
To ask yourself what decision you would make
|
|
To ask yourself how you can help them make that decision
|
|
To ask them why they have not made the decision
|
|
To ask yourself why they have not made that decision
|
|
|
|
28.
|
Each side rarely has multiple interests.
|
|
|
|
29.
|
The most powerful interests are basic human needs.
|
|
|
|
30.
|
A common error in diagnosing a negotiating situation is to assume that each person on the other side has the same interests.
|
|
|
|
31.
|
Basic human needs include:
|
|
A vacation home
|
|
A corner office
|
|
Security
|
|
Peace and quiet
|
|
|
|
32.
|
It is your responsibility to explain your interests to the other side.
|
|
|
|
33.
|
Being specific about the details of your interests will make your interests seem less credible to the other side.
|
|
|
|
34.
|
It's important to acknowledge the other side's interests as part of the problem.
|
|
|
|
35.
|
If you want someone to listen and understand your reasoning, give your interests and reasoning first and your conclusions or proposals later.
|
|
|
|
36.
|
You will satisfy your interests better if you come to an agreement or settlement of things that happened in the past before you proceed to the future.
|
|
|
|
37.
|
It may not be wise to commit yourself to your position, but it is wise to commit yourself to your interests.
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 4 - Invent Options for Mutual Gain
38.
|
The method of principled negotiation involves inventing options for mutual gain.
|
|
|
|
39.
|
One major obstacle that inhibits the inventing of an abundance of options is thinking that solving their problem is their problem.
|
|
|
|
40.
|
The following is not a major obstacle that inhibits the inventing of an abundance of options:
|
|
Premature judgment
|
|
Searching for the single answer
|
|
The generation of wild ideas
|
|
The assumption of a fixed pie
|
|
|
|
41.
|
Inventing options comes naturally.
|
|
|
|
42.
|
Inventing is part of the negotiation process.
|
|
|
|
43.
|
Most people see their job in negotiation as narrowing the gap between options, not broadening the options available.
|
|
|
|
44.
|
Before brainstorming, you should
|
|
Define your purpose
|
|
Eat a good lunch
|
|
Design a formal atmosphere
|
|
Not make advance preparations
|
|
|
|
45.
|
To invent creative options, you will need to combine the act of inventing options and the act of judging them.
|
|
|
|
46.
|
During brainstorming, you should record the ideas in full view.
|
|
|
|
47.
|
The type of thinking in which you diagnose an existing situation in general terms is known as descriptive analysis.
|
|
|
|
48.
|
Examination of your problem from the perspective of different professions and disciplines will help to generate multiple options.
|
|
|
|
49.
|
Since success for you in a negotiation depends upon the other side’s making a decision you want, you should do what you can to make that decision an easy one.
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 5 - Insist on Using Objective Criteria
50.
|
The method of principled negotiation involves insisting on using objective criteria.
|
|
|
|
51.
|
Your chance of benefiting from past experience becomes greater the more you and the other side:
|
|
Refer to precedent and community practice
|
|
Brainstorm
|
|
Stick to your guns
|
|
Utilize third party facilitators
|
|
|
|
52.
|
Trying to settle differences of interest on the basis of will has high costs.
|
|
|
|
53.
|
It’s never a good idea to ask the other side what the theory is behind their position.
|
|
|
|
54.
|
An example of objective criteria is:
|
|
Your professional opinion
|
|
Market value
|
|
The greater amount
|
|
The first option presented
|
|
|
|
55.
|
Ideally, to assure a wise agreement, objective criteria should be not only independent of will but also both legitimate and practical.
|
|
|
|
56.
|
In order to negotiate with objective criteria, it’s a good idea to frame each issue as a joint search for objective criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 6 - What if They Are More powerful?
57.
|
You BATNA is your:
|
|
Battery Activated Turbo Nuclear Antenna
|
|
Best Actual Technology Not Activated
|
|
Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
|
|
Believed Authoritative Test for Not Arguing
|
|
|
|
58.
|
Adopting a bottom line limits your ability to benefit from what you learn during negotiation.
|
|
|
|
59.
|
The standard against which any proposed agreement should be measured is :
|
|
Your bottom line
|
|
Your BATNA
|
|
Your trip wire
|
|
Your best proposition
|
|
|
|
60.
|
A bottom line increases imagination.
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 7 - What if they Won’t Play?
61.
|
In negotiation jujitsu, you should attack the other side’s position.
|
|
|
|
62.
|
If the other side chooses to play the game of positional bargaining, you can change the game simply by starting to play a new one.
|
|
|
|
63.
|
A way to channel criticism in a constructive direction is to turn the situation around and ask for their advise.
|
|
|
|
64.
|
In negotiation jujitsu, rather than resisting the other side’s criticism, you should invite it.
|
|
|
|
65.
|
A key tool in negotiation jujitsu is:
|
|
Preparing bold statements in advance
|
|
Being persuasive
|
|
Having the upper hand
|
|
Asking questions
|
|
|
|
66.
|
Some of the most effective negotiating you will ever do is when you are not talking.
|
|
|
|
67.
|
The one-text procedure shifts the game from positional bargaining and simplifies the process of inventing options and deciding jointly on one.
|
|
|
|
68.
|
It's important to get everyone's consent before beginning the one-text procedure.
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 8 - What if They Use Dirty Tricks?
69.
|
In negotiating the rules of the negotiating game, you should recognize the tactic, raise the issue explicitly, and:
|
|
Call the police
|
|
Discontinue negotiations
|
|
Question the tactic's legitimacy and desirability
|
|
Use the tactic to your advantage
|
|
|
|
70.
|
Before beginning any negotiation, it's a good idea to inquire about the level of authority held by the negotiator on the other side.
|
|
|
|
71.
|
Positional pressure tactics are designed to structure the situation so that only one side can effectively make concessions.
|
|
|
|
72.
|
An example of a positional pressure tactic is:
|
|
Refusal to negotiate
|
|
Extreme demands
|
|
Escalating demands
|
|
All of the above
|
|
|
|
73.
|
Psychological warfare tactics are designed to make you feel uncomfortable so that you will have a subconscious desire to end the negotiation as soon as possible.
|
|
|
|
74.
|
It is easier to defend principle than an illegitimate tactic.
|
|
|
|
75.
|
The good-guy bad-guy routine is a form of deliberate deception.
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 9 - In Conclusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|